Everything You Need to Know About Pari Passu Clauses in Loans

The conclusion drawn from the interpretation put forth by both the Belgian Court in Elliott and Professor Lowenfeld is that equal treatment of creditors of equal rank is required, both in the context of bankruptcy or liquidation and payment to any such creditor made . Where the loans are pari passu, all the unsecured creditors will be ranked equally. It implies that when a business or a person will liquidate its assets, all unsecured creditors will be repaid equally or proportionally to each individual creditor’s debt. Pari passu is a Latin legal term meaning „with equal step” or „on equal footing.” It underscores the equal ranking of creditors in liquidation. The term has its origins in bankruptcy law, where unsecured creditors have equal seniority to receive proportional repayment based on the amount owed. When a company declares bankruptcy, pari passu dictates that all unsecured creditors will be treated equally based on the size of their claims.

Hypothecation does not involve physical possession of the security or asset, but involves delivery of a document or other evidence of title to the Bank. Normally, a token mortgage is registered for a minimal amount of the marked-up price of the facility or for a small portion of D.P.Note amount, while to cover the remaining amount of D.P.Note equitable mortgage is created on the property offered as security. Sometimes, it is also named in other words like ‘ranking equally’, ‘with equal force’, ‘hand in hand’, or ‘moving together’. Raveena is a seasoned International IP Counsel with a unique blend of engineering and legal acumen, specializing in Intellectual Property, Technology Law, and Corporate Transactions. She has extensive experience drafting and negotiating NDAs, commercial agreements, and legal documents in the areas of M&A, SaaS, and AI.

1. The requirement of knowledge of the prohibited transaction prior the assignment of receivers is a hitch for the application of the abovementioned remedies.
2. The pari passu principle serves an important equitable purpose in insolvency situations to facilitate orderly and fair asset distribution.
3. There is always a catch though; if this proposition is not acute, then the other propositions will fall away as well.
4. Lien is a legal right/claim to take and hold or possess the property/assets/documentary intangibles/certificates/accounts/deposits, etc., of a debtor as security against a loan or for payment of a loan.
5. This clause also safeguards unsecured creditors’ rights to assets held by the company.

💡 Expert-Led Sessions📊 Build Financial Models⏳ 60+ Hours Learning

As new financial instruments emerge, application of pari passu will require clarity from courts. Debt covenants are legally binding terms and conditions between a company and its lenders that are designed to protect the interests of debt holders. Common covenants include limits on additional debt, maintenance of certain financial ratios, restrictions on payments to shareholders etc. This protects investors by preventing the company from issuing more senior securities in the future that have greater rights and privileges. It prevents situations where common shareholders are paid despite defaults to preferred shareholders.

Everything You Need to Know About Pari Passu Clauses in Loans

Suppose company A is about to go bankrupt and that it has five stakeholders who have been with it through all of its ups and downs. Shareholders will receive assets worth $200,000 each, according to the provision. The floating charge is useful for many companies, allowing them to borrow even though they have no specific assets, such as freehold premises, which they can use as security. A floating charge allows all the company’s assets, such as stock in trade, plant and machinery, vehicles, etc., to be charged. Having differential coupon rates would violate pari passu, as it effectively makes one set of bonds more valuable and senior to the other.

1. The reason for this is that the clause does not provide any constraints for other unsecured liabilities which are classified equally with the loan or even aid in the allocation of specific assets to the loan.
2. Where the assets which are liable to the security are deemed as having no indispensable influence on the country’s potential to settle the IBRD debt, the Managing Director’s assent is adequate.
3. The rationale of the clause as a general rule lies in its ability to execute a number of assorted functions which hinge upon the scenarios where it is applicable.
4. Pari Passu clauses are relevant to unsecured creditors only where the loan is not secured by any collateral such as a house or a car.
5. So, When a company becomes bankrupt, the pair passu charge enables lenders to get a share from the sale of assets of a business propionate to the respective holding of the creditors.

Now, if the company defaults on its loans, both Bank A and Bank B will have an equal right to recover their funds. This means that both banks will share the available assets on a pro-rata basis. The pari passu rule allows equal distribution of assets among parties specified in a will or trust.

As soon as the interested parties enter the contract, the pari passu clause would give every stakeholder equal right over liquidation, dividends, and voting. That is why the company clarifies that no priority would be given to any specific set of people involved in the deal while issuing the agreement. Pari Passu is a standard clause in a financial agreement that ensures equal management and distribution of assets, securities, and debt obligations among creditors. Parties to a contract or claim are treated without discrimination and at the same time under this arrangement. A joint pari passu charge means that where more than one creditors have lent money to a same debtor, all creditors will rank pari passu with each other in relation to a loan or debt obligation.

In other words, the clause is nullified by the lack of equality in the right to payment in such cases. If a firm becomes bankrupt, liquidates its assets, or has outstanding loans or debts, it must repay its creditors first. In other words, the lack of equality in the right to payment nullifies the provision in such situations. The investment of party ABC was declared as Pari-passu to all other types of investment. This agreement will enable the party ABC with the same rights and privileges as that of other parties ITC and AHP. Now if the pari passu charge meaning company faces bankruptcy, party ABC will have rights similar to the other two parties and receive claims in proportionate to their investment.

Practical Implications and Future Considerations

Similarly, the employees of a business can also be treated as creditors if they are owed unpaid wages. Black’s Law Dictionary (8th ed., 2004) defines pari passu as „proportionally; at an equal pace; without preference”. In venture capital deals, pari passu often applies to liquidation preferences and dividends. Preferred shareholders typically have liquidation preferences and guaranteed dividends. The principle would apply to the management of assets or securities in the sense that the assets or securities would be managed with equal preference or a preference weighted on the value or amount invested in either the asset or securities. Wills and trusts can assign a pari-passu distribution where all the named parties share the assets equally.

Preferred shareholders have priority over common shareholders when it comes to asset distribution. Pro rata refers to the equal distribution of something among a group, usually based on an agreed-upon formula. For example, investors in a startup may receive pro rata rights that allow them to participate in future funding rounds at the same percentage level as their initial investment. Pari passu is a Latin legal phrase meaning „with equal step” or „on equal footing.” It is used to describe how certain groups of investors or creditors are entitled to receive payment or repayment. The principle of pari-passu can also be applied in clauses or covenants of debt instruments like bonds. Companies issue bonds as a part of debt financing to raise capital; pari-passu would be implemented in bonds to ensure that each bond is equal.

Find the talent you need to grow your business

Mortgage means transferring the conditional right of ownership on fixed assets (property/building/land) by its owner (the mortgagor) to a lender (the mortgagee) as security against some loan facility. The mortgage is recorded in the register of title documents to make it public information, and is cancelled when the loan is repaid in full. Pari passu is an important legal concept that impacts corporate finance arrangements, especially during bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings. For example, within the tranche of senior secured debt holders, the principle can apply to those creditors within that tranche. With common voting shares, each share is equal in the sense that they hold a voting right and are equal in case of a liquidation. With preferred shares, each share is equal in the sense that they each hold an equal preference with dividend distributions and a preference (ahead of common shares) in the case of a liquidation.

Equity Shares

The borrower thereby represents that the security has the ranking, or status in law, that the borrower professes it has, including that it does not rank equally and without preference to other security rights, that is, it ranks ahead of other security. Similarly, a borrower making such a representation ought to satisfy itself that this is in fact the case, and that other lenders do not enjoy preferential security rights. The pari passu clause in the context of security gives the lender the comfort that legally, the security rights have the ranking that the borrower represents they have. Initially, we have the ‘strict negative pledge ‘ which consists of the normal agreement not to furnish security to any other creditor. Thirdly, there is the ‘equal security clause ‘ which provides restraint for the borrower to be granted security to subsequent lenders. It additionally gives equal security to the original lender in the event that he breached the first prohibition.

Examples of such failure include the creditor possession, or even control or filing in a public registry. Last but not least, Re Eric Holmes implies that security may possibly fail as an insolvency preference on the grounds that it arises in the suspect period. On this note, it is worth mentioning that the negative pledge clause is incapable of altering the requisite order of priority of debts implemented by many jurisdictions in dealing with corporate insolvency and the covenant is oftentimes accommodated to comment upon. 175 (2)(a) of the Insolvency Act 1986 that states that ‘preferential claims are to rank equally among themselves and would abate in equal proportions if the company’s assets are insufficient to meet them in full’ . Ho supports that the ‘ratable treatment of preferential claims inter se constitutes the application of this principle, whereas the very existence of preferential claims constitutes an exception to the pari passu principle, properly understood in the orthodox sense’ .

This concept is different in comparison to most of the agreements among borrowers and lenders where a hierarchy is established to repay the debt amount among all creditors. However, when we compare the rights of the creditors with shareholders pari passu is not applicable. So, When a company becomes bankrupt, the pair passu charge enables lenders to get a share from the sale of assets of a business propionate to the respective holding of the creditors. For example, if a company issues secured bonds with a pari passu clause, as well as preferred shares, the bondholders and preferred shareholders will have equal rights over the collateral in case of liquidation or bankruptcy. In the legal context, a pari passu clause ensures that if a borrower has multiple creditors or classes of creditors, they will be repaid on equal terms. A pari passu clause signifies that all specified creditors or investors will be repaid on equal terms.